FHA Making it More Expensive to Get a Mortgage

by Brian Carr on January 20, 2010

In what may be yet another blow to the housing market – don’t fool yourselves, kids, the housing market isn’t currently rebounding, nor will it start its rebound any time soon – starting tomorrow, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) will make it more expensive and harder to get a loan through them.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think these are bad moves, and will ultimately help keep troubled loans and foreclosed properties off of Uncle Sam’s books. In fact, regulations like this will help us avoid another housing bubble in the future.

That being said, tightening the regulations now, while a good idea, is likely to prolong the decline in housing prices and mute the recent increase in sales.

According to the FHA’s press release, the new regulations aim to:

1) Increase the up-front mortgage insurance premium (MIP) from 1.75% to 2.25%, as well as request approval to increase the maximum annual MIP that FHA can charge.

2) Force borrowers with low credit scores to bring a higher down payment. If you have a credit score of less than 580, you will be required to bring a down payment of at least 10%, which is up from 3.5%.

3) Reduce seller concessions – usually money at closing – from six percent to three percent. This will help to protect the FHA from inflated home appraisals.

These rules will not only help the FHA to mitigate and hedge some of its risk, but it will also allow the agency to rebuild its reserve fund. With the FHA having issued nearly one out of every three mortgages in 2009, it certainly needs to mitigate its risk and rebuild its cushion.

While these changes may be a bitter pill to swallow right now, in the long run, I think they will help to restore some normalcy to the battered housing market.

What are your thoughts? Do you like these changes? Think they’re not worth the risk to the housing market recovery? Leave your thoughts below.

{ 1 comment }

A Divided Fed? What Will They Do Next?

by Brian Carr on January 7, 2010

For the first time in a while, it looks like there might be some division among the Federal Reserve’s policy setting members regarding when the central bank should begin to tighten its easy money policies that have been credited with keeping the U.S. economy afloat during the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.

The Federal Reserve has expanded its balance sheet by purchasing $1.5 trillion worth of Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities, as well as making loans available to banks and investment firms for collateral that would usually be deemed too high risk and unacceptable.

In addition to expanding its balance sheet, the Fed has lowered the Federal funds rate to a record low of “near 0%.” Many revolving consumer loans – credit cards, home equity loans, etc. – are tied to the federal funds rate, so the lower the rate, the cheaper these loans and debt become.

The Federal Reserve’s measures have helped to thaw the credit market, slow the bleeding in the housing market and slightly revive consumer spending, which, in turn, has the economy in a fledgling recovery.

So, at what point does the Fed back off and start to tighten its monetary policy?

On one hand, you’ve got policy members – most importantly, chairman Ben Bernanke – who appear to want to make sure the economic recovery has a strong footing before starting to tighten the screws.

While waiting to remove the stimulus would certainly help the economy in the near-term, it could end up creating more bubbles (read: commodities) and push us towards an inflationary recession at some point down the road.

On the other hand, you’ve got policy members – most importantly, inflation hawk Thomas Hoenig – who want to tighten monetary policies sooner rather than later.

While acting now will help to squash the threat of inflation down the road, it could kill the current economic recovery and undo all of the work done to this point.

Based on the fact unemployment is above 10% and will likely climb higher through at least the middle of 2010, and the dollar has been strengthening lately, I expect the Fed will wait a while before pulling its monetary stimulus and raising short-term interest rates. Plus, their track record shows the central bank tends to be a bit behind the curve (read: not pro-active).

What are your thoughts?  What would you like to see the Fed do?  What do you think they’ll do?  Leave your comments below!

{ 0 comments }

Morgan Stanley Sees Higher Treasury Yields in 2010. Economic Recovery in Jeopardy?

December 28, 2009

ShareThanks to a ballooning Federal fiscal deficit, Oliver Biggadike and Daniel Kruger of Bloomberg.com report that the chief fixed-income economist at Morgan Stanley believes the yield of 10 year U.S. Treasury will climb to 5.5% in 2010, which is about 40% higher than the current yield. 
(Click here to read their article in full).
This is pretty [...]

Read the full article →

Personal Spending, Income and Savings Up in November

December 23, 2009

ShareAccording to the Commerce Department, personal income climbed 0.4% during November, which is the largest increase in the past six months. Additionally, personal spending increased by a modest 0.5% in November as well.
While it’s good to see these numbers increasing, it should be noted that the gains in both personal income and personal spending came [...]

Read the full article →

Bond Yields Rise, Indicating Belief in Economic Recovery

December 22, 2009

ShareDon’t look now, but it appears that investors are betting on an economic recovery in 2010 that will be stronger than most economists are currently predicting.
Since the beginning of the week, the yield on the 10 year Treasury bond – which is pretty much the benchmark in terms of outward looking economic indicators – has [...]

Read the full article →